Skip to main content

Stardrive 2 - Still Needs Some Polish, but Amazing for a One-Man Project

This title came out of early access recently, though it still needs (and is getting) some work. It was on sale this week on Steam, so I gave it a try, and I'd encourage any fan of 4X space games to do so too.

It's possibly the most ambitious 4X space game since MoO3 or the original Macintosh Pax Imperia (which has almost no relationship, sadly, to the very stupid, dumbed down, realtime "sequel" of a few years later). Doubly impressive because the developer is a single person (Daniel Dicicco).

The influence of MoO2 is obvious but heartfelt, and switching the strategic game to turn-based from the realtime of Stardrive 1 was a really really good move, making time and attention for the details that don't work in an RTS.

Seeing the patchlog, I'm pleased to see consistent progress with good priorities. The game is already playable (though some parts don't work as well as they should) and looks likely to be really "done" in another couple months. If we are lucky, Dicicco will continue  working on it as a labor of love, and in a few years have something to rival Dwarf Fortress

Currently, the area most in need of polish is the ground combat. The UI is full of problems there - the camera angle isn't steep enough to see the square grid near walls and there is no wall transparency; mouse aim is very hard to judge, so it's easy to end up moving one unit when you are really trying to select another. The rules for engagement and ranged attack are not clear. There are also other purely UI problems, like the lack of edge scrolling (which is present in the strategic game). Just allowing freer camera motion, or moving the fixed camera to a steeper angle, would help a lot. So would consistent selection feedback, and allowing a click anywhere in a square to mean selecting/targeting the unit in that square.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Guild Wars 2 (developers who pay attention)

After playing MMOs as old as EverQuest and Ultima Online, through various other games including WoW, Rift, and EVE Online, I've come to appreciate that most MMOs are aimed at very specific sorts of players or even specific ways to get people to pay money. Only a few, of which Rift deserves honorable mention but Guild Wars 2 is the extreme standout, show a great deal of thought as to what is fun for many different types of player, and consequent design features that provide for most or all of those player types. GW2 is particularly notable in that I find what I do in a play session is almost completely determined by what I'm in the mood to to do. It does not take hours of exclusive dungeon crawling to get gear useful in harder dungeons; players who focus on or exclusively play in the RvR (called "WvW" because the competition is between servers, not between game factions) areas do not acquire gear that makes mostly-PvE players unable to compete with them, and the struc...

OK, Blogger is Moribund

Can't delete a spam comment, the UI for it is gone but the hell still says to look in the old place. Mobile UI is a mess, desktop UI doesn't work on Android. G+ seems to be on its way to shutting down. I loathe Facebook as a company and distrust giving them and chance to run code on my property. Google can't be trusted to leave a working product alone and working. Sigh.

Planar Conquest - FInally a MoM-alike worth playing - but fatally flawed

I picked up this title a while ago, and at first was very excited. It's clear that somebody finally actually made a MoM-alike that's actually a lot like MoM. Unlike most of the early attempts, you are the big wizard in the tower, not on the battlefield, and your decisions about magic are the central focus of strategy. The game setup screens had me really excited. It's presented differently but the choices are extremely similar to those in MoM - anything that wouldn't be infringing is practically verbatim, but the presentation is clearer and cleaner. The big change is the larger and interlocking array of spell schools, which are more or less lifted from recent games (IIRC it's straight out of Sorcerer King). In fact, the most striking thing about these screens is that they are still basically low-resolution, though higher than the ancient original. I think they are 1024x768x16. And the gameplay itself is very similar, with some new ideas stolen from the HoMM ser...