Skip to main content

Why Stellaris diplomacy feels so bloodless

By

I'm still playing stellaris in almost all my gaming time, and enjoying it, primarily because I've found and either used or stolen ideas from a bunch of mods that fix problems that are fixable.

To be honest, some of these I like because they straddle the line carefully between moving it more toward a pure 4X game and losing the fresh voice in 4X coming from the Paradox grand strategy sauce. Some of the resource constraints pot such limits on early strategies that you are forced to let the early game become just the randomization step for a mostly static patchwork of essentially equivalent-powered empires, so the midgame looks just like one of their historical games. But removing them entirely is too much; I dial then down so the decisions of the early game become significant ones about how to grow my empire - how much physical expansion, how much infrastructure, how much defense - instead of meaningless firefighting while waiting for the static nap to evolve.

But all that said, I'm realizing more and more that it's in the diplomacy - the very heart of what should be Paradox's homeland, that I'm feeling the worst about the game. They've admitted that the lack of visible personality or goals in the opponents us a big problem, but there's also a horrible lack of options. Basically, if you are in conflict with another error, you can either declare war or suck it up. You can't make demands, you can't make threats, you can't warn that something they are doing will lead to war.

Most of this would require a lot of development time, and i do hope that Paradox's reputation for great ongoing improvements will address that. But why on Earth it in the stars is there o option for an ultimatum? Give me that colony you just started along the border, it I will take it by force? As things are now, I just have to declare war, and in doing that there's no advantage to keeping the war goals in the declaration small. In fact, because they will be free to do whatever they like for ten years after the war ends, a limited war is a really bad idea - you need to hurt their infrastructure enough that they will take those years to rebuild.

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Can't write, must play Pillars of Eternity

By
OMFG, I've barely started the game and I'm already hooked and feeling alt-oholic. I only looked at character generation and the first few minutes of play last night, as I can't afford to miss a day of work just for a new game any more. But I'm already sure that this game is living up to high expectations. It's not perfect, there are some flaws that Rock, Paper, Shotgun already did a good job describing, but this is better than many of the game I've paid $60 for over the years. Going to be hard to tear myself away long enough to keep my wife and toddler from getting upset at me this weekend.
Post a Comment
Read more

The highest bang-for-buck thing in Fallout 4

By
So, I had a hankering for some first-person murder hoboing the other day just when Steam put Fallout 4 on sale, so I gave up my plan to wait for the GOTY edition. It's mostly living up to my expectations, good and bad, based on reviews and on previous Bethesda games. The ostensible plot hook (lost baby) is completely underwhelming (sorry, clicking a blob of pixels a couple times can't compare to bonding with a real baby) but irrelevant to the game anyway. The main plot sounds potentially less stupid than the one for FO3. The settlement stuff is not quite as bolted onto the side of the game as I expected - taking time and perks to improve your settlement network can pay off in upgrade mats. But the thing that surprised me most pleasantly was remarkably simple. If you choose a somewhat common name for your character, the voiced robot butler will actually call you by name (http://fallout.wikia.com/wiki/Codsworth/recognized_names). I didn't know this going in, and my first ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Sid Meier's Starships - It doesn't suck on PC

By
Apparently a surprisingly large number of fans were expecting to get a deep game like a Civ or a spacegoing Pirates! for $16 on a short development cycle; they also apparently did  not even look at the gameplay footage that's been available for weeks. Going in with my eyes open, though, I have little to complain about in the gameplay itself. It's pretty much what the video promised. The tie-in with Beyond Earth, modulo the bugs I'm about to mention, is no clumsier than I expected. The requirement to set up a 2K account to get the tie-in is not yet onerous - we'll see where that goes, and hope that it's not like EA's player abuse system. Where the game totally fails, though is that despite being developed in parallel, and despite Firaxis' experience with PC games, it comes across as a crappy iPad port. Most of these things are inexcusable, showing either or both of a lack of testing on the PC or a lack of caring about PC quality: It only plays in ...
Post a Comment
Read more