Skip to main content

Path of Exile (developers who pay attention)

Path of Exile is a very deep game that is, IMO, a far better re-envisioning of Diablo II than the official Diablo III. It achieves this from a much better understanding of what is fun for the players and what is not, and with a lack of greed that Activision won't allow to Blizzard.

The joy of long-term D2 players, and the frustration of newcomers, is in the rigidity of the character's "build". If you want to try a different way to play a character, you need to start a new one and work up to the point where your new strategy becomes viable before you can try it. Most "builds" require some choices of equipment (sometimes very specific items, sometimes general guidelines) which you must acquire via finding or trading.

PoE addresses this to a carefully calculated balance point. No choices you make about your character are irrevocable, and the choice of what skills you are using is extremely fungible. The hard thing to change is the allocation of points (one per level) on the passive skill web. So if you want to change your Arc (a lighting spell)-using character to use Ball Lightning (also a lightning spell), you won't be hampered at all by your choice of passives. If you want to change to Static Strike (a lightning melee attack) or Lightning Arrow (a lightning bow attack) you might get reduced results depending on which passives you chose (Lightning damage would still apply, but spell damage wouldn't for example).

If you are planning to make this kind of transition (say, the skill you plan to focus on is not usable until level 31), the effects of passive choices are cumulative enough that you can usually plan a path that will help while you are still using "placeholder" attacks, and the game is pretty forgiving at the early levels when choices are most constrained.

Another part of this flexibility is in the character "classes". Your class determines your base stats (which will become mostly irrelevant as you use passive picks and equipment to raise them) and your starting point on the passive web (which is very important but by the time you have finished Normal difficulty and moved on to Cruel you could have grown into another character's starting area quite easily).

A final really important thing, in which PoE has gone the completely opposite direction from Diablo 3, is that there is no game gold. None. There are items which are referred to as "currencies" (by developers and players) but they are all things with meta-effects on other items (equipment, skill gems, passive tree). If, for example, your character needs a new rare bow suitable for their level, you could use an Orb of Alchemy to turn a white bow into a random rare (which might or might have useful affixes for your character) - OR you could ask other players in-game or on the forums what they'd trade for one that fits you better; often the extra effort of looking for a trade will get you a great item for the same Orb that you would have used to get a random one - because the other player can use that orb as currency that's more useful to him/her than the bow is, while the bow is more useful to you than a random rare would be.

As I mentioned in the parent article, PoE is completely free to play. You can download the client and start immediately. Real money will get you more (shared) stash space, let you start a guild with its own shared stash, or let you jazz up your character's appearance with special effects, non-combat pets, and so forth with no game effect. In a very real sense, PoE lives off of being so good that players will buy these cosmetic items in order to support the game - or you could say that those who support the game get cosmetic things to show their status.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

This article didn't quite change my life, but it was the most worthwhile thing I've read in a while

I like the games I like, and I'm no longer in the business of making games, so in many ways this article is not to my address. But it was still really worth my time to read carefully. It never gets anywhere near the stupid misogynistic pseudo-editorial "defense of games" crap that I'm not naming to avoid the still-raging humans pretending to be flamebots, and it comes from the opposite, and very constructive direction. And it quotes Tim Gunn more than once, in a very on-topic way. Tim Gunn is an awesome individual, even though I doubt he's ever been in the same room as a videogame for long. http://www.gamesindustry.biz/articles/2016-11-07-video-games-are-boring

This sounds pretty amazing, unique, and intriguing

This sounds really amazing - something like Eternal Darkness only not horrific, in that the game reaches out from the screen to interact with the player out of character. In ED that deepened the horror and provided comic relief simultaneously; this sounds like it might feel differently to different people but still very cool I don't need to repeat the RPS article, I'll just link to it. https://www.rockpapershotgun.com/2016/12/12/oneshot-review/

The little-known game I'm anticipating almost as much as T:ToN

I backed a project called "A House of Many Doors" a while ago on Kickstarter, and it now has a "Coming Soon" store page on Steam. This only matters because, unlike the normal case where every KS update seems like a "don't forget us please" marketing spiel, the ones on this have been insights into the author's ideas for how the game will be different and why he is making it. The backer update that accompanied the announcement about the Steam page is a great example, and I think maybe other folks might find it as intriguing as I do: "Without going too much into spoiler territory, the way to advance the main quest is by exploration itself. You need to gather a resource called 'Apprehensions,' representing your knowledge of the House and all its secrets and oddities. You can collect Apprehensions by writing poetry, discovering new locations, or completing side-quests. (Why did I choose this design? Well, I was fed up of the thing you g...