Skip to main content

Two Games whose Developers Pay Attention

I've been thinking recently about the two games that have claimed the majority of my gaming time over the past couple of months and over the past couple of years. While both are RPGs with meaningful character choices, they are quite disparate - but they have a common thread and it's in the quality of the developers.

Guild Wars 2 is an MMO, while Path of Exile is an online action RPG along the lines of Diablo. The mechanics, the game worlds and their properties, the playerbases are all quite different. But they have something in common that makes them stand out in their categories:

These developers have paid close attention to what people like and hate, enjoy and don't enjoy, about these types of games from well before the game was released, and they have continued to refine and iterate to make them fun for more players and more fun for existing players. Interestingly enough, they both also eschew ongoing revenue for anything but cosmetic or convenience microtransactions, relying on the goodwill of the players and frequent releases of new cosmetic options for income; GW2 charges once for the game client, but PoE doesn't even do that.

In embracing fun for all their players, both games also reject anything that would be fun for the sort of trolls and arsewipes who get their fun from ruining other players' day. PvP is available in ways that are both consensual and designed not to affect PvE players. Other forms of griefing like "kill stealing" are mechanically impossible.

Other commonalities seem to come from these points. Gold farming, power-leveling, and other schemes for spending real money for game advantages are nigh-nonexistent in both games, and the players seem to be a bit more civil.

I'll go into more detail about both of these games in separate articles soon. Meanwhile, if you are interested in either of these genres do yourself a favor and try them out.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Can't write, must play Pillars of Eternity

OMFG, I've barely started the game and I'm already hooked and feeling alt-oholic. I only looked at character generation and the first few minutes of play last night, as I can't afford to miss a day of work just for a new game any more. But I'm already sure that this game is living up to high expectations. It's not perfect, there are some flaws that Rock, Paper, Shotgun already did a good job describing, but this is better than many of the game I've paid $60 for over the years. Going to be hard to tear myself away long enough to keep my wife and toddler from getting upset at me this weekend.

The highest bang-for-buck thing in Fallout 4

So, I had a hankering for some first-person murder hoboing the other day just when Steam put Fallout 4 on sale, so I gave up my plan to wait for the GOTY edition. It's mostly living up to my expectations, good and bad, based on reviews and on previous Bethesda games. The ostensible plot hook (lost baby) is completely underwhelming (sorry, clicking a blob of pixels a couple times can't compare to bonding with a real baby) but irrelevant to the game anyway. The main plot sounds potentially less stupid than the one for FO3. The settlement stuff is not quite as bolted onto the side of the game as I expected - taking time and perks to improve your settlement network can pay off in upgrade mats. But the thing that surprised me most pleasantly was remarkably simple. If you choose a somewhat common name for your character, the voiced robot butler will actually call you by name (http://fallout.wikia.com/wiki/Codsworth/recognized_names). I didn't know this going in, and my first ...

This article didn't quite change my life, but it was the most worthwhile thing I've read in a while

I like the games I like, and I'm no longer in the business of making games, so in many ways this article is not to my address. But it was still really worth my time to read carefully. It never gets anywhere near the stupid misogynistic pseudo-editorial "defense of games" crap that I'm not naming to avoid the still-raging humans pretending to be flamebots, and it comes from the opposite, and very constructive direction. And it quotes Tim Gunn more than once, in a very on-topic way. Tim Gunn is an awesome individual, even though I doubt he's ever been in the same room as a videogame for long. http://www.gamesindustry.biz/articles/2016-11-07-video-games-are-boring