Skip to main content

Two Games whose Developers Pay Attention

By
I've been thinking recently about the two games that have claimed the majority of my gaming time over the past couple of months and over the past couple of years. While both are RPGs with meaningful character choices, they are quite disparate - but they have a common thread and it's in the quality of the developers.

Guild Wars 2 is an MMO, while Path of Exile is an online action RPG along the lines of Diablo. The mechanics, the game worlds and their properties, the playerbases are all quite different. But they have something in common that makes them stand out in their categories:

These developers have paid close attention to what people like and hate, enjoy and don't enjoy, about these types of games from well before the game was released, and they have continued to refine and iterate to make them fun for more players and more fun for existing players. Interestingly enough, they both also eschew ongoing revenue for anything but cosmetic or convenience microtransactions, relying on the goodwill of the players and frequent releases of new cosmetic options for income; GW2 charges once for the game client, but PoE doesn't even do that.

In embracing fun for all their players, both games also reject anything that would be fun for the sort of trolls and arsewipes who get their fun from ruining other players' day. PvP is available in ways that are both consensual and designed not to affect PvE players. Other forms of griefing like "kill stealing" are mechanically impossible.

Other commonalities seem to come from these points. Gold farming, power-leveling, and other schemes for spending real money for game advantages are nigh-nonexistent in both games, and the players seem to be a bit more civil.

I'll go into more detail about both of these games in separate articles soon. Meanwhile, if you are interested in either of these genres do yourself a favor and try them out.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

This article didn't quite change my life, but it was the most worthwhile thing I've read in a while

By
I like the games I like, and I'm no longer in the business of making games, so in many ways this article is not to my address. But it was still really worth my time to read carefully. It never gets anywhere near the stupid misogynistic pseudo-editorial "defense of games" crap that I'm not naming to avoid the still-raging humans pretending to be flamebots, and it comes from the opposite, and very constructive direction. And it quotes Tim Gunn more than once, in a very on-topic way. Tim Gunn is an awesome individual, even though I doubt he's ever been in the same room as a videogame for long. http://www.gamesindustry.biz/articles/2016-11-07-video-games-are-boring
Post a Comment
Read more

GW2 Heart of Thorns, after some serious play time

By
The first week or two after Heart of Thorns went live, I was a bit disappointed. Playing on, first because four of my friends and I always play together on Mondays, I got a little more of a philosophical handle on how the expansion changes the game, and I'm no longer ambivalent about having bought it - I love some parts, and I just had to learn that the "different kinds of fun as you feel like it" game design is now painted in broader strokes - especially you should only go into one of the new zones if you feel like the activity that is going on in it. Roughly speaking, HoT adds four things to the game: A new character class, a new "elite" subclass for each class, a new form of progression at L80, and a bunch of new zones with their story. Of these, the zones are the most visible and important, and the mastery tracks are the most novel and IMO successful, so I'll leave those for last. In thinking about these changes together, I think I see a philosophica...
Post a Comment
Read more

The highest bang-for-buck thing in Fallout 4

By
So, I had a hankering for some first-person murder hoboing the other day just when Steam put Fallout 4 on sale, so I gave up my plan to wait for the GOTY edition. It's mostly living up to my expectations, good and bad, based on reviews and on previous Bethesda games. The ostensible plot hook (lost baby) is completely underwhelming (sorry, clicking a blob of pixels a couple times can't compare to bonding with a real baby) but irrelevant to the game anyway. The main plot sounds potentially less stupid than the one for FO3. The settlement stuff is not quite as bolted onto the side of the game as I expected - taking time and perks to improve your settlement network can pay off in upgrade mats. But the thing that surprised me most pleasantly was remarkably simple. If you choose a somewhat common name for your character, the voiced robot butler will actually call you by name (http://fallout.wikia.com/wiki/Codsworth/recognized_names). I didn't know this going in, and my first ...
Post a Comment
Read more