Skip to main content

Two Games whose Developers Pay Attention

By
I've been thinking recently about the two games that have claimed the majority of my gaming time over the past couple of months and over the past couple of years. While both are RPGs with meaningful character choices, they are quite disparate - but they have a common thread and it's in the quality of the developers.

Guild Wars 2 is an MMO, while Path of Exile is an online action RPG along the lines of Diablo. The mechanics, the game worlds and their properties, the playerbases are all quite different. But they have something in common that makes them stand out in their categories:

These developers have paid close attention to what people like and hate, enjoy and don't enjoy, about these types of games from well before the game was released, and they have continued to refine and iterate to make them fun for more players and more fun for existing players. Interestingly enough, they both also eschew ongoing revenue for anything but cosmetic or convenience microtransactions, relying on the goodwill of the players and frequent releases of new cosmetic options for income; GW2 charges once for the game client, but PoE doesn't even do that.

In embracing fun for all their players, both games also reject anything that would be fun for the sort of trolls and arsewipes who get their fun from ruining other players' day. PvP is available in ways that are both consensual and designed not to affect PvE players. Other forms of griefing like "kill stealing" are mechanically impossible.

Other commonalities seem to come from these points. Gold farming, power-leveling, and other schemes for spending real money for game advantages are nigh-nonexistent in both games, and the players seem to be a bit more civil.

I'll go into more detail about both of these games in separate articles soon. Meanwhile, if you are interested in either of these genres do yourself a favor and try them out.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Looks like Nintendo may have gotten their head back into daylight this time

By
The Wii U was (IMO) a dumb idea that (factually) tanked, evidence that Nintendo had no clue how to follow up what made the Wii a breakthrough product. But it looks like they may have figured out what they are doing right with the 3DS, and how to really cash in on the new trend toward multiscreen entertainment at home without being needlessly expensive, asymmetrically lame on multiplayer, and totally separate from their successful handhelds. http://kotaku.com/heres-your-first-look-at-the-nx-nintendos-upcoming-con-1788004927
Post a Comment
Read more

Stellaris: Post-Honeymoon Review and Musings

By
If you're a TL;DR sort of person, here you go: Stellaris is not a 4X game at all. Its core design goes a completely different direction. It has some cool bits in it that will probably catch on in future 4X games, and by using mods to tune it I got a hundred or so hours of fun out of it before the honeymoon wore off, but in the long run it will likely be remembered as a non-4X game that was nonetheless a good influence on the genre. To go into more depth for those inclined: Pre-release, the big excitement about Stellaris was the hope for innovation in a 4X in ways to make the late game less of a grind - that period when you know you've won but the mechanics of getting the victory screen will take hours more. This was a bit of marketing poetry, or maybe outright disingenuous. At its core, Stellaris is not a 4X game. It's a pretty standard Paradox set-piece grand strategy game with a "1X" game bolted on the beginning to substitute for the real-world history t...
Post a Comment
Read more

GW2 Heart of Thorns, after some serious play time

By
The first week or two after Heart of Thorns went live, I was a bit disappointed. Playing on, first because four of my friends and I always play together on Mondays, I got a little more of a philosophical handle on how the expansion changes the game, and I'm no longer ambivalent about having bought it - I love some parts, and I just had to learn that the "different kinds of fun as you feel like it" game design is now painted in broader strokes - especially you should only go into one of the new zones if you feel like the activity that is going on in it. Roughly speaking, HoT adds four things to the game: A new character class, a new "elite" subclass for each class, a new form of progression at L80, and a bunch of new zones with their story. Of these, the zones are the most visible and important, and the mastery tracks are the most novel and IMO successful, so I'll leave those for last. In thinking about these changes together, I think I see a philosophica...
Post a Comment
Read more