Skip to main content

A brief note on the latest backer update from Torment: Tides of Numenara

By

The latest backer update went into some detail about the way character generation is handled in-game. I like this approach, and it sounds like they're doing it right.

But the tone of the post really annoyed me. The writer acted as if they were inventing all of this stuff new, when in fact what they describe is exactly what pretty much all the Elder Scrolls games have done starting with Morrowind, and is also evolutionarily related to the "fortune teller" character generation used in several Ultimas (though that actually devolved over time; by Ultima 7 it was very perfunctory).

I find it hard to believe that the senior folks at Obsidian are ignorant of two major families of CRPG. I find it more likely that the marketer who wrote the piece was less than fully engaged in gaming. Either way, it's a huge mar on the face of a team and product that I'm eagerly awaiting.

Doing something right, yay.
Acting as if nobody had done it before, boo.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

This article didn't quite change my life, but it was the most worthwhile thing I've read in a while

By
I like the games I like, and I'm no longer in the business of making games, so in many ways this article is not to my address. But it was still really worth my time to read carefully. It never gets anywhere near the stupid misogynistic pseudo-editorial "defense of games" crap that I'm not naming to avoid the still-raging humans pretending to be flamebots, and it comes from the opposite, and very constructive direction. And it quotes Tim Gunn more than once, in a very on-topic way. Tim Gunn is an awesome individual, even though I doubt he's ever been in the same room as a videogame for long. http://www.gamesindustry.biz/articles/2016-11-07-video-games-are-boring
Post a Comment
Read more

New Stellaris patch - the power of a name, the sadness of the lame

By
Paradox just shipped a free update to Stellaris featuring a story written by Alexis Kennedy. That's enough to get me to think about trying it again. I checked out the patch notes, and I see a lot of clean up of things that bugged me about the game. But wait a minute. These are the notes for the fourth major patch, and they clean up things that were wrong (sometimes obviously) from the start? I'll chalk it up to development priorities; certainly there was a lot missing that needed to be added, and since the main point of the game is to look like a 4X while actually being a 1X bolted on to a standard Paradox set-piece political game I guess problems with the other three Xes were not as high a priority. I'm certain I'll try Stellaris again at some point, especially if they get more good writers in on making snippets for it. But I doubt it will ever really be my kind of game.
Post a Comment
Read more

GW2 Heart of Thorns, after some serious play time

By
The first week or two after Heart of Thorns went live, I was a bit disappointed. Playing on, first because four of my friends and I always play together on Mondays, I got a little more of a philosophical handle on how the expansion changes the game, and I'm no longer ambivalent about having bought it - I love some parts, and I just had to learn that the "different kinds of fun as you feel like it" game design is now painted in broader strokes - especially you should only go into one of the new zones if you feel like the activity that is going on in it. Roughly speaking, HoT adds four things to the game: A new character class, a new "elite" subclass for each class, a new form of progression at L80, and a bunch of new zones with their story. Of these, the zones are the most visible and important, and the mastery tracks are the most novel and IMO successful, so I'll leave those for last. In thinking about these changes together, I think I see a philosophica...
Post a Comment
Read more