Skip to main content

OMG, Squeenix hits a new low on hating its customers

Among my circle of friends, it's taken as established fact that Squeenix hates its players. They haven't released a game since the departure of Hiromichi Tanaka that didn't contain something that showed this.

Certainly the last Deus Ex title amply demonstrated the hatred, with the stupid "what, you were playing a stealth game? Naaah, it's an action game!" boss fights and, even worse, the grotesquely non-closing final voiceover in lieu of an actual ending cinematic and the parody of having multiple endings (you push one of four buttons, all next to each other on a console, and what difference it makes to the stupid final voiceover is too insignificant to spot).

But the announcement this week about the pre-order "bonuses" for Deus Ex: Mankind Divided are a new low. The initial structure is the already-annoying "you only get a pre-order bonus if enough people pre-order" system, which is a travesty to start with. But even if you do play along with that crap, you will only get one choice from each of the early tiers of "if enough people". If you want to get all three bits, you have to shell out more than 250% of the normal edition price for the "collector's edition".

And the top tier, get this: They will release the game 4 days earlier. Think about that. Does that mean that they'll magically finish it faster? No, it means they are going to hold it back for four days unless enough people cough up the bucks for the pig in the poke.

To me, this strongly suggests that the game sucks in some horrid way that will become obvious as soon as people start playing it, and they know it.

This is definitely one game not to pre-order!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eJkzcQDqbpE

https://www.deusex.com/augmentyourpreorder

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

New Stellaris patch - the power of a name, the sadness of the lame

Paradox just shipped a free update to Stellaris featuring a story written by Alexis Kennedy. That's enough to get me to think about trying it again. I checked out the patch notes, and I see a lot of clean up of things that bugged me about the game. But wait a minute. These are the notes for the fourth major patch, and they clean up things that were wrong (sometimes obviously) from the start? I'll chalk it up to development priorities; certainly there was a lot missing that needed to be added, and since the main point of the game is to look like a 4X while actually being a 1X bolted on to a standard Paradox set-piece political game I guess problems with the other three Xes were not as high a priority. I'm certain I'll try Stellaris again at some point, especially if they get more good writers in on making snippets for it. But I doubt it will ever really be my kind of game.

The highest bang-for-buck thing in Fallout 4

So, I had a hankering for some first-person murder hoboing the other day just when Steam put Fallout 4 on sale, so I gave up my plan to wait for the GOTY edition. It's mostly living up to my expectations, good and bad, based on reviews and on previous Bethesda games. The ostensible plot hook (lost baby) is completely underwhelming (sorry, clicking a blob of pixels a couple times can't compare to bonding with a real baby) but irrelevant to the game anyway. The main plot sounds potentially less stupid than the one for FO3. The settlement stuff is not quite as bolted onto the side of the game as I expected - taking time and perks to improve your settlement network can pay off in upgrade mats. But the thing that surprised me most pleasantly was remarkably simple. If you choose a somewhat common name for your character, the voiced robot butler will actually call you by name (http://fallout.wikia.com/wiki/Codsworth/recognized_names). I didn't know this going in, and my first ...

This article didn't quite change my life, but it was the most worthwhile thing I've read in a while

I like the games I like, and I'm no longer in the business of making games, so in many ways this article is not to my address. But it was still really worth my time to read carefully. It never gets anywhere near the stupid misogynistic pseudo-editorial "defense of games" crap that I'm not naming to avoid the still-raging humans pretending to be flamebots, and it comes from the opposite, and very constructive direction. And it quotes Tim Gunn more than once, in a very on-topic way. Tim Gunn is an awesome individual, even though I doubt he's ever been in the same room as a videogame for long. http://www.gamesindustry.biz/articles/2016-11-07-video-games-are-boring