Skip to main content

Renowned Explorers International

It's pure luck (or maybe karma) that I even looked at this game, but I'm really glad I bought it for more than one reason.

The day it came out, Tess had just that morning asked me what I had been playing, and I answered "Path of Exile". Her response was "Don't you ever play things with non-depressing titles?". If that conversation hadn't happened, I probably wouldn't have looked very deeply at the news of the release on Steam, and I might have missed a game that is both fun and innovative.

Before I get into the ways in which the actual game design is innovative, I should mention two things.

First, it's a really fun little game. I don't expect to be playing it fanatically, but it doesn't require a huge time commitment yet has some strategic depth and fun storytelling. I'll likely have it installed for a long time, playing it in short spurts when I haven't the time for a deeper game or am just taking a break.

Second, much has been written about the way in which the encounter system treats physical attacks, bullying speech, and friendly speech all as ways of getting your opponents to let you do what you want; additional mechanics around the mood of the encounter and each participant add to this theme.

But despite the philosophically interesting flavor of this, the actual underlying mechanics in this area are far from new. Each character's available attacks are categorized into one of the three bins, assigned a mood effect from the subset appropriate to that bin, and a global rock-scissors-paper superiority mechanic based on the recent attacks used by both sides makes changing bins in mid-encounter with the right timing extra effective.

But what is really interesting to me about the game design here is the fresh take on some of the common elements of the recently-trendy "roguelike" genre. In most of these games that feature highly random procedurally generated maps, battles, and character upgrades, the randomness is king. Every playthrough is very different, but at least as much as in the ASCII classics the genre name evokes, player skill takes a huge backseat to luck.

Renowned Explorers does something really different here. While the rewards from the random adventures are randomized, they are expressed in terms of a set of currencies - call them research, fame, and money. The trees on which you spend these currencies are almost completely nonrandom, and they interact in different ways to directly buff your party members or your incomes.

The net result is a game that is both much more interesting and much less frustrating than most "roguelikes", because your success is dominated by your choices, rather than by random loot. "Encounters" (battles) are also fairly deterministic, though there is a small random component to damage. There is enough randomization that even if you make identical strategic choices you can get very different payoffs, but enough determinism that your choices really do matter.

It's a fine balancing act, and it's very well done. I'm particularly impressed that this level of innovation showed up in an indie "roguelike" game, of which it seems like there is at least one new one every week, many of which are best described as "like <x> but <y>" for some other roguelike "x".


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Guild Wars 2 (developers who pay attention)

After playing MMOs as old as EverQuest and Ultima Online, through various other games including WoW, Rift, and EVE Online, I've come to appreciate that most MMOs are aimed at very specific sorts of players or even specific ways to get people to pay money. Only a few, of which Rift deserves honorable mention but Guild Wars 2 is the extreme standout, show a great deal of thought as to what is fun for many different types of player, and consequent design features that provide for most or all of those player types. GW2 is particularly notable in that I find what I do in a play session is almost completely determined by what I'm in the mood to to do. It does not take hours of exclusive dungeon crawling to get gear useful in harder dungeons; players who focus on or exclusively play in the RvR (called "WvW" because the competition is between servers, not between game factions) areas do not acquire gear that makes mostly-PvE players unable to compete with them, and the struc...

OK, Blogger is Moribund

Can't delete a spam comment, the UI for it is gone but the hell still says to look in the old place. Mobile UI is a mess, desktop UI doesn't work on Android. G+ seems to be on its way to shutting down. I loathe Facebook as a company and distrust giving them and chance to run code on my property. Google can't be trusted to leave a working product alone and working. Sigh.

Planar Conquest - FInally a MoM-alike worth playing - but fatally flawed

I picked up this title a while ago, and at first was very excited. It's clear that somebody finally actually made a MoM-alike that's actually a lot like MoM. Unlike most of the early attempts, you are the big wizard in the tower, not on the battlefield, and your decisions about magic are the central focus of strategy. The game setup screens had me really excited. It's presented differently but the choices are extremely similar to those in MoM - anything that wouldn't be infringing is practically verbatim, but the presentation is clearer and cleaner. The big change is the larger and interlocking array of spell schools, which are more or less lifted from recent games (IIRC it's straight out of Sorcerer King). In fact, the most striking thing about these screens is that they are still basically low-resolution, though higher than the ancient original. I think they are 1024x768x16. And the gameplay itself is very similar, with some new ideas stolen from the HoMM ser...