Skip to main content

Civ BE: Rising Tide

Hmm. They are the last company that still has it, but with their last few releases, Firaxis has almost lost my unconditional buy-it flag.

In particular, the wartime diplomacy system in Rising Tide is so restrictive of player choices that Sid Meier ought to be turning over in his chair. This, and the other ways in which the new diplomacy system removes player agency, are well covered in the RPS article (http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/2015/10/08/beyond-earth-rising-tide-review/) so I don't need to repeat them myself. (Although the actual bug involving allies and war declarations was patched almost immediately.)

Overall, Rising Tide is a definite if not quite good enough improvement for BE, roughly like the first expansion to Civ5. It adds some important systems and addresses some balance issues, but is still not "done" yet. I hope the next expansion, like the second one for Civ5, will make it a complete and satisfying game.

One of the biggest handicaps that BE has compared to a mainline Civ is the lack of character for the different factions. Alpha Centauri very carefully crafted character for the factions, and reflected it in the AIs as well as the abilities. Moving from Civ5 to BE, the most noticeable thing is the loss of unique buildings and units, and the genericity and blandness of the "unique" abilities. Rising Tide works hard in this area, making the unique abilities much more distinctive. Sadly, it does this at the cost of balance - some of the abilities are totally naff, others are amazing. The three new factions with water starts are all crippled by the high startup cost of making a seagoing colony work - it takes them a long time to get their capital up to the productivity of a land-based starting capital. Two of the three have no particular synergy or even connection between being sea-based and their abilities; the remaining one sounds on paper like it might help make them competitive, but it's a late-blooming advantage which has a hard time overcoming the early problems.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Can't write, must play Pillars of Eternity

OMFG, I've barely started the game and I'm already hooked and feeling alt-oholic. I only looked at character generation and the first few minutes of play last night, as I can't afford to miss a day of work just for a new game any more. But I'm already sure that this game is living up to high expectations. It's not perfect, there are some flaws that Rock, Paper, Shotgun already did a good job describing, but this is better than many of the game I've paid $60 for over the years. Going to be hard to tear myself away long enough to keep my wife and toddler from getting upset at me this weekend.

The highest bang-for-buck thing in Fallout 4

So, I had a hankering for some first-person murder hoboing the other day just when Steam put Fallout 4 on sale, so I gave up my plan to wait for the GOTY edition. It's mostly living up to my expectations, good and bad, based on reviews and on previous Bethesda games. The ostensible plot hook (lost baby) is completely underwhelming (sorry, clicking a blob of pixels a couple times can't compare to bonding with a real baby) but irrelevant to the game anyway. The main plot sounds potentially less stupid than the one for FO3. The settlement stuff is not quite as bolted onto the side of the game as I expected - taking time and perks to improve your settlement network can pay off in upgrade mats. But the thing that surprised me most pleasantly was remarkably simple. If you choose a somewhat common name for your character, the voiced robot butler will actually call you by name (http://fallout.wikia.com/wiki/Codsworth/recognized_names). I didn't know this going in, and my first ...

This article didn't quite change my life, but it was the most worthwhile thing I've read in a while

I like the games I like, and I'm no longer in the business of making games, so in many ways this article is not to my address. But it was still really worth my time to read carefully. It never gets anywhere near the stupid misogynistic pseudo-editorial "defense of games" crap that I'm not naming to avoid the still-raging humans pretending to be flamebots, and it comes from the opposite, and very constructive direction. And it quotes Tim Gunn more than once, in a very on-topic way. Tim Gunn is an awesome individual, even though I doubt he's ever been in the same room as a videogame for long. http://www.gamesindustry.biz/articles/2016-11-07-video-games-are-boring