Skip to main content

The highest bang-for-buck thing in Fallout 4

By
So, I had a hankering for some first-person murder hoboing the other day just when Steam put Fallout 4 on sale, so I gave up my plan to wait for the GOTY edition.

It's mostly living up to my expectations, good and bad, based on reviews and on previous Bethesda games. The ostensible plot hook (lost baby) is completely underwhelming (sorry, clicking a blob of pixels a couple times can't compare to bonding with a real baby) but irrelevant to the game anyway. The main plot sounds potentially less stupid than the one for FO3. The settlement stuff is not quite as bolted onto the side of the game as I expected - taking time and perks to improve your settlement network can pay off in upgrade mats.

But the thing that surprised me most pleasantly was remarkably simple. If you choose a somewhat common name for your character, the voiced robot butler will actually call you by name (http://fallout.wikia.com/wiki/Codsworth/recognized_names). I didn't know this going in, and my first scratch character didn't trigger it (Dairine didn't make the list) but my "real" character did (Diana, since she's a stealth riflewoman).

It would be even cooler if all the companions started calling you by name once they start to like you. But having the first voiced character you meet after emerging from the Vault actually speak your name was as surprisingly engaging as the "baby plot" was expectedly not.

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Guild Wars 2 (developers who pay attention)

By
After playing MMOs as old as EverQuest and Ultima Online, through various other games including WoW, Rift, and EVE Online, I've come to appreciate that most MMOs are aimed at very specific sorts of players or even specific ways to get people to pay money. Only a few, of which Rift deserves honorable mention but Guild Wars 2 is the extreme standout, show a great deal of thought as to what is fun for many different types of player, and consequent design features that provide for most or all of those player types. GW2 is particularly notable in that I find what I do in a play session is almost completely determined by what I'm in the mood to to do. It does not take hours of exclusive dungeon crawling to get gear useful in harder dungeons; players who focus on or exclusively play in the RvR (called "WvW" because the competition is between servers, not between game factions) areas do not acquire gear that makes mostly-PvE players unable to compete with them, and the struc...
1 comment
Read more

OK, Blogger is Moribund

By
Can't delete a spam comment, the UI for it is gone but the hell still says to look in the old place. Mobile UI is a mess, desktop UI doesn't work on Android. G+ seems to be on its way to shutting down. I loathe Facebook as a company and distrust giving them and chance to run code on my property. Google can't be trusted to leave a working product alone and working. Sigh.
Post a Comment
Read more

Planar Conquest - FInally a MoM-alike worth playing - but fatally flawed

By
I picked up this title a while ago, and at first was very excited. It's clear that somebody finally actually made a MoM-alike that's actually a lot like MoM. Unlike most of the early attempts, you are the big wizard in the tower, not on the battlefield, and your decisions about magic are the central focus of strategy. The game setup screens had me really excited. It's presented differently but the choices are extremely similar to those in MoM - anything that wouldn't be infringing is practically verbatim, but the presentation is clearer and cleaner. The big change is the larger and interlocking array of spell schools, which are more or less lifted from recent games (IIRC it's straight out of Sorcerer King). In fact, the most striking thing about these screens is that they are still basically low-resolution, though higher than the ancient original. I think they are 1024x768x16. And the gameplay itself is very similar, with some new ideas stolen from the HoMM ser...
Post a Comment
Read more