Skip to main content

Stellaris: Post-Honeymoon Review and Musings

If you're a TL;DR sort of person, here you go: Stellaris is not a 4X game at all. Its core design goes a completely different direction. It has some cool bits in it that will probably catch on in future 4X games, and by using mods to tune it I got a hundred or so hours of fun out of it before the honeymoon wore off, but in the long run it will likely be remembered as a non-4X game that was nonetheless a good influence on the genre.

To go into more depth for those inclined:

Pre-release, the big excitement about Stellaris was the hope for innovation in a 4X in ways to make the late game less of a grind - that period when you know you've won but the mechanics of getting the victory screen will take hours more.

This was a bit of marketing poetry, or maybe outright disingenuous. At its core, Stellaris is not a 4X game. It's a pretty standard Paradox set-piece grand strategy game with a "1X" game bolted on the beginning to substitute for the real-world history that their other games can leverage.

Reading the Steam and Paradox forums and looking at most of the gameplay mods being written brings out this dichotomy clearly, too. For example, I saw some Paradox fans talk about how Stellaris fixes the "boredom" of the exploration phase. Awrk? The exploration phase is one of the most exciting parts of a 4X game - all that terra incognita: territory, opponents, strategic spots all unknown and some that won't even be known when you first see them. Early plans that may or may not survive discovering the actual lay of the land. In a good 4X (and IMO of course) the exploration phase is second only to the middle of a war for being the time it's hardest to resist JOMTS.

So, this is not the replacement for MoO2. I do think and hope that the two things it really does well in the exploration stage will be adopted by future real 4X games. The "anomaly" vignettes, including how large the pool is and how generally well written they are, are a lot of fun. So is the simple, balanced, but still meaty and replay-worthy race/empire design. And the inclusion of three different FTL drives, distinct but balanced, is very cool - one of the many ideas that Sword of the Stars tried and failed to pull off.

And it's not a total loss by any means - I got 100 or so hours of play before the honeymoon wore off, and will still be playing from time to time (at least until Civ 6 arrives), because you can use mods and the game settings screen to make expansion and exploitation doable and avoid most of the ways that things are railroaded into the Paradoxy midgame.

As I wrote a couple days ago, throwing out their mechanics wholesale leaves the game just broken, but if you tone down the cash and mineral maintenance costs for everything but ships and non-spaceport stations, and leave the "influence" mechanics pretty much alone, you can get a playable, if slightly odd, 4X-style game. The diplomacy, tuned for the Paradoxy game, feels somewhat broken, and the lack of anything but military victory conditions is a bit limited.

I'll finish this up here; probably in the next couple of days I'll follow up with a post on the set of mods I am using.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

This article didn't quite change my life, but it was the most worthwhile thing I've read in a while

I like the games I like, and I'm no longer in the business of making games, so in many ways this article is not to my address. But it was still really worth my time to read carefully. It never gets anywhere near the stupid misogynistic pseudo-editorial "defense of games" crap that I'm not naming to avoid the still-raging humans pretending to be flamebots, and it comes from the opposite, and very constructive direction. And it quotes Tim Gunn more than once, in a very on-topic way. Tim Gunn is an awesome individual, even though I doubt he's ever been in the same room as a videogame for long. http://www.gamesindustry.biz/articles/2016-11-07-video-games-are-boring

Remembering SimTex

SimTex was one of the first game studios in Austin (not counting Origin, an independent publisher until the 90s). They produced only three games, but each of them has an important place in the history of strategy gaming. Here's the list in chronological order: Master of Orion was the first 4X space game to break the "more complexity and more micromanagement is what we want/need" mindset. By reducing individual planetary management to a few sliders, they made room for a relatively rich ship design system and room for real strategic thought, long before PCs could support both. Master of Magic is a unique blend of Civilization-style gameplay with the feeling of being a serious world-dominating-class wizard in competition with others in that league. Several good games have come from trying to duplicate parts of MoM, but generally they reduce the power of the wizard-player in some way, often making them a unit on the board. A currently pre-release title, Worlds of Magic, is...

Can't write, must play Pillars of Eternity

OMFG, I've barely started the game and I'm already hooked and feeling alt-oholic. I only looked at character generation and the first few minutes of play last night, as I can't afford to miss a day of work just for a new game any more. But I'm already sure that this game is living up to high expectations. It's not perfect, there are some flaws that Rock, Paper, Shotgun already did a good job describing, but this is better than many of the game I've paid $60 for over the years. Going to be hard to tear myself away long enough to keep my wife and toddler from getting upset at me this weekend.